The Freedom Of Press Essay










“I would rather have a free Press, with all the dangers that may result from a wrong use of that freedom, than a suppressed or strangulated Press.”                                                                            – J.L. Nehru


                “Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without government, I shall not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.      -Jefferson


                Freedom of the Press is the very foundation of and an essential condition for a successful Democracy.  It is the backbone of Democracy.  In India, the freedom of the Press has been guaranteed by the Constitution.  The Press is supposed to be an active link between the government and the people in a democratic country.  It investigates official lapses and makes the facts public.  It is, in fact, a watch-dog of democracy.  It keeps the government on its toes by exposing its various misdoings and acts as a true mirror of public opinion.

                The people in a democratic country have a right to know things and this right is a part of the Fundamental Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression.  Hence it is the duty of the Press to keep the people informed, educated and alert.  The freedom of the Press does not, however, mean freedom to distort facts, freedom to blackmail people or freedom to indulge in character assassination or cheap sensationalism.  The Press is meant to educate public opinion ; it is not meant to incite people to senseless violence.  The press is not an enemy of the government ; it is supposed to help government efforts in creating a healthy climate in society.  The press is not there to add to the people’s problems and spell misery and dissatisfaction ; it has to work to promote the common weal.  The Press has to know its responsibilities.  It has to ensure that its writings conform to the national objectives and do not run counter to them.

                The Press in India, has by and large, been enjoying complete and unfettered freedom.  But, at times, it seems that the Press does not play its part in a responsible manner.  The freedom enjoyed by the Press is grossly misused.  At times, a section of the Press is clearly committed to a line of thought and refuses to look at things objectively.  It looks at things through the tinged glasses of prejudice and indulges in mudslinging and baseless criticism.  Not only that, some papers openly promote communal hatred and create unnecessary tensions through baseless news and biased views.

                There are some important power groups who start their own papers.  These people have either enough money to those papers, periodicals and magazines or have their cells in the government to bag a big chunk of hefty advertisements and mint money.  They create a permanent nexus with a particular group or party and go on toeing their line in their papers.  They have no scruples or qualms of conscience to do their real duty.  Their only duty is to serve their masters and misguide public thought.  The government must evolve some mechanism to check all this and make the press accountable to the country in some way.

                No one can argue or claim that the freedom of speech and expression is an absolute and unfettered right.  No government worth the name can permit irresponsible writings, yellow journalism or slander.  The Press should rise to the occasion and assure the government and the people that it would always act as the responsible and enlightened  Fourth Estate and would refrain from misusing the freedom granted to it.  The Press in India has always been playing a responsible role.  In the pre-independence days, it was only the National Press that inculcated a spirit of freedom and sacrifice amongst the masses.  It refused to be cowed down by the British threats.  The Press must, once again, try to live up to its reputation and try to maintain its noble traditions.  It must act as a watch-dog to keep a vigilant eye on the government.  Men in power are sometimes likely to run amuck and trample the rights of the have- nots, under their feet. The press must, in such situations, expose the guilty to the full without fear or favour.  A vigilant, fearless and responsible Press is an important pillar of strength in a democratic set up.  The Press must not, therefore, fail in its duty.  The government should also not misuse its powers to scuttle the growth of the Press. Self-restraint and self-discipline alone can contribute to the growth of a healthy Democracy in any country.

borse alviero martini
christian louboutin pas cher
toms canada boxing day
michael kors uk
prada portafoglio
mcm bagpack
michael kors sale uk
cheap ray ban sunglasses
mulberry outlet uk
mcm handbag

July 21, 2015evirtualguru_ajaygour10th Class, Class 12, English (Sr. Secondary), English 12, Languages2 CommentsEnglish 10, English 12, English Essay Class 10 & 12, English Essay Graduation

About evirtualguru_ajaygour

The main objective of this website is to provide quality study material to all students (from 1st to 12th class of any board) irrespective of their background as our motto is “Education for Everyone”. It is also a very good platform for teachers who want to share their valuable knowledge.

Freedom Of The Press Essay

Freedom of the Press

Although a cherished right of the people, freedom of the press is different from other liberties of the people in that it is both individual and institutional. It applies not just to a single person's right to publish ideas, but also to the right of print and broadcast media to express political views and to cover and publish news. A free press is, therefore, one of the foundations of a democratic society, and as Walter Lippmann, the 20th-century American columnist, wrote, "A free press is not a privilege, but an organic necessity in a great society." Indeed, as society has grown increasingly complex, people rely more and more on newspapers, radio, and television to keep abreast with world news, opinion, and political ideas. One sign of the importance of a free press is that when antidemocratic forces take over a country, their first act is often to muzzle the press.

Thomas Jefferson, on the necessity of a free press (1787)

The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.

* * * * *

The origins of freedom of speech and press are nearly alike, because critical utterances about the government, either written or spoken, were subject to punishment under English law. It did not matter whether what had been printed was true; government saw the very fact of the criticism as an evil, since it cast doubt on the integrity and reliability of public officers. Progress toward a truly free press, that is, one in which people could publish their views without fear of government reprisal, was halting, and in the mid-18th century the great English legal commentator, Sir William Blackstone, declared that although liberty of the press was essential to the nature of a free state, it could and should be bounded.

Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765)

Where blasphemous, immoral, treasonable, schismatical, seditious, or scandalous libels are punished by English lawthe liberty of the press, properly understood, is by no means infringed or violated. The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state; but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publication, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published. Every freeman has undoubted right to lay what sentiments he pleases before the public; to forbid this is to destroy the freedom of the press: but if he publishes what is improper, mischievous, or illegal, he must take the consequences of his own temerity.

But what constituted "blasphemous, immoral, treasonable, schismatic, seditious or scandalous libels"? They were, in fact, whatever the government defined them to be, and in essence, any publication even mildly critical of government...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Freedom of Press or Danger to Troops?

965 words - 4 pages Freedom of Press or Danger to Troops? The news has been an important source of information for as long as it has been around. News during a time of war is sometimes the only way a family member, friend, or general public have any idea what the soldiers are going through. Having this source of information can help rally support for our troops when they need all the support they can get. As reporters are granted more access to military operations...

Should Freedom of the Press be Limited to Protect National Security?

1597 words - 6 pages Should Freedom of the Press be Limited to Protect National Security? Every single American Citizen has their own rights and privileges, dating back to 1787 when the U.S. constitution was born. This was the first legal document stating citizen rights. Four years later, in 1791, the First Amendment was passed, stating several American citizen rights including Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Expression, the...

Is Freedom of Press really exists in no limit

1185 words - 5 pages Does the public really have full power of Freedom of Press?Freedom of Press, the right that guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, refers to gather, publish, and distribute information and ideas without government restriction which encompasses freedom from prior restraints on publication and freedom from...

Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition

918 words - 4 pages Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition There are three main reasons why we have or need our Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. First, the 1st Amendment gives us our independence. Second, it also gives us the right to express ourselves. Last but not least, it allows people to express themselves without constraint by the government. The 1st Amendment is a very essential freedom...

America, Land of the free. Discusses what would happen if it didn't have the freedom of press, and the freedom of speech

807 words - 3 pages America, land of the free. America, a country based in many ways on the freedom of press, and the freedom of speech. But what would happen to this great country, tis of thee, if these precious rights had ceased to exist? America, the land of liberty and home of the brave, would hold a great stock of uninformed and uneducated community, ready to rise up to anarchy at any moment; a crowd of undiverse and ununified people; and a population of...

Freedom of Speech and Press in Venezuela: In Danger of Disappearing

1348 words - 5 pages An awful reality, the freedom of speech and press in Venezuela is in danger of disappearing. In Venezuela, if someone has a different opinion of the President of the country, Hugo Chavez, could be penalized. Can the opposition movements, including student force, change this current reality? What can the common citizens do against the government when every day it is capable of setting down more severe restrictions to silence the press? Should the...

Democracy: The Four Theories (Systems) of Press

1626 words - 7 pages One must first understand what a democratic system is, and its importance on journalism. According to Lyman Tower Sargent, the seven types of liberty that compose a democratic ideology are: The right to vote. Freedom of speech. Freedom of the press. Freedom of assembly. Freedom of religion. Freedom of movement. Freedom from arbitrary treatment by the political and legal system. While all of the above liberties are vital to a democratic...

Social Responsibility Theory (SRT) of the Press

628 words - 3 pages - History* 16 & 17 century - Authoritarian Theory placed print media under the control of the Kind which meant the church and state had control of the media.* 1680 - Libertarian theory argued that media did not need to be controlled because people would follow their conscience, engage in public debate, and create a better life for themselves.* John Milton in Aeropagetica said that in a fair debate, good and truth...

The History and Impact of the Printing Press

2308 words - 9 pages Everyday people read newspapers and books, but where did printing begin? The movable type printing press by Johannes Gutenberg made this all possible. Johannes first conceived of this idea of the printing press in the 15th century in order to speed up the slow process of producing books (Bantwal). The movable type printing press, the first real technology of its kind, helped to solve problems, but in turn also caused problems. This technology did...

Johann Gutenberg and the Impact of the Printing Press

3046 words - 12 pages “Johann Gutenberg and the Impact of the Printing Press” Johann Gutenberg is credited for the invention of the printing press, a monumental advancement in technology that changed the world forever. It has been regarded as, “one of the most important inventions in the history of humankind.” What was once a tedious process, became a fast, easy, and cheap way to produce great quantities of books. It granted public access to a wealth of knowledge...

The Faces Of Freedom

1313 words - 5 pages The Faces Of Freedom How does one define freedom? The OED gives about a dozen useful definitions that each pertain to one of a variety of the aspects of the human state. One referred specifically to the political freedoms of an individual: “Exemption from arbitrary, despotic, or autocratic control; independence; civil liberty” (def. 2). Another definition concerned the spiritual freedom found in Christianity: “fig. Liberation from the...

0 thoughts on “The Freedom Of Press Essay”


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *